- A judge in Oregon has rejected a U.S. Department of Justice request to dismiss a 2015 lawsuit filed by young people.
- The lawsuit alleges that the federal government was aware of the dangers of carbon pollution but continued to support the fossil fuel industry.
- The plaintiffs in the Oregon case argue that the government violated young people’s constitutional rights to life, liberty and property.
A judge in Oregon has rejected a U.S. Department of Justice request to dismiss a 2015 lawsuit brought by young people that alleges the federal government knew the dangers posed by carbon pollution but that it has continued through policies and subsidies to support the fossil fuel industry.
U.S. District Court Judge Ann Aiken said the parties “do not disagree that the climate crisis threatens our ability to survive on planet Earth. This catastrophe is the great emergency of our time and compels urgent action.”
“While facts remain to be proved, lawsuits like this highlight young people’s despair with the drawn-out pace of the unhurried, inchmeal, bureaucratic response to our most dire emergency,” she wrote in her decision late last week.
OREGON APPEALS COURT INVALIDATES STATE CLIMATE PROTECTION PROGRAM RULES
In a statement, Julia Olson, an attorney with the group Our Children’s Trust representing the plaintiffs, said she expects a trial in the case later this year.
A view of the lecture is seen at the Department of Justice in Washington, DC. A judge in Oregon has rejected a U.S. Department of Justice request to dismiss a 2015 lawsuit filed by young people.
In a similar lawsuit in Montana, a judge last year ruled the Montana Environmental Policy Act violates the plaintiffs’ state constitutional right to a clean and healthful environment. The 1971 law requires state agencies to consider the potential environmental impacts of proposed projects and take public input before issuing permits. The state’s attorney general has appealed that decision.
OREGON POWER COMPANY TO PAY NEARLY $300 MILLION TO SETTLE LATEST LAWSUIT OVER 2020 WILDFIRES
The plaintiffs in the Oregon case argued the government has violated young people’s constitutional rights to life, liberty and property.
