The firearms industry took a blow Thursday when a federal court ruled that New Jersey can sue gun manufacturers under the state’s “public nuisance” law.
A three-judge panel on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled that a legal challenge brought against the law by the National Sports Shooting Foundation (NSSF) was premature. Though the court acknowledged the law is somewhat vague about what conduct can trigger a lawsuit from the state, it nevertheless said the firearms industry “jumped the gun” by filing a legal challenge before demonstrating injury.
“The National Shooting Sports Foundation challenges a new state gun law as violating its members’ constitutional rights. But we see little evidence that enforcement is looming,” wrote Judge Stephanos Bibas, a former President Trump appointee.
New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy, a Democrat, signed the “public nuisance” law in July 2022, clearing a path for the state’s attorney general to file lawsuits against local gun businesses based on an exception to the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which broadly protects the industry from liability.
ILLINOIS GOV. JB PRITZKER SIGNS LAW BANNING FIREARM ADVERTISEMENTS THAT APPEAL TO CHILDREN
A convention attendee looks at rifles at the Sig Sauer booth at the 2018 National Shooting Sports Foundation’s Shooting, Hunting, Outdoor Trade Show at the Sands Expo and Convention Center on Jan. 23, 2018 in Las Vegas. New Jersey’s “public nuisance” law permits the state to sue gun manufacturers after mass shootings. (Ethan Miller/Getty Images)
Four months after it took effect, NSSF sued to block it, claiming the law runs afoul of the federal statute. In January, a district court granted the NSSF’s bid for a preliminary injunction, saying the law was in “direct conflict” with the PLCAA.
However, since NSSF sued before New Jersey had a chance to enforce its law, the 3rd Circuit panel held that NSSF’s complaint was hypothetical.
“With so much still vague and uncertain, a court should not weigh in,” Bibas wrote.
In a statement, New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin said he was “thrilled” with the court’s decision.
ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS STATE’S BAN ON SALE OR POSSESSION OF SEMIAUTOMATIC WEAPONS
New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy speaks during the 2023 State of the State Address at the New Jersey State House in Trenton, New Jersey, on Tuesday, Jan. 10, 2023. Murphy signed the “public nuisance” law in 2022 in response to several mass shootings and the landmark Supreme Court decision that broadly expanded gun rights. (Aristide Economopoulos/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
“Our law never should have been enjoined, and now it will be back in effect in its entirety,” Platkin said. “This law is an important public safety tool, which is why I created the Nation’s first statewide office dedicated to holding accountable those whose unlawful conduct causes bloodshed, and fuels the gun violence epidemic, for the sake of their bottom line.”
NSSF General Counsel Lawrence Keane said in a statement the group will file another complaint against New Jersey should the “public nuisance” law be enforced against the gun industry.
5TH CIRCUIT DEALS BLOW TO FEDERAL GUN STATUTE USED IN HUNTER BIDEN CASE
Matthew Platkin, attorney general of New Jersey, speaks during the National Safer Communities Summit at Hartford University in West Hartford, Connecticut, Friday, June 16, 2023. Platkin said he was “thrilled” with the 3rd Circuit’s unanimous decision upholding New Jersey’s gun law. (Bing Guan/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
“While we respectfully disagree with the court’s decision on our pre-enforcement challenge, it is important to note the court did not say New Jersey’s law does not violate the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act; it clearly does,” Keane said.
New Jersey was among the first states to pass a law opening the gun industry up to litigation in response to several mass shootings and the Supreme Court’s landmark 2022 decision broadly expanding gun rights. Blue state governors in Colorado, Hawaii, Washington and Illinois have signed similar laws in recent months.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The 3rd Circuit’s ruling is the first time a federal appellate court has weighed in on one of these laws.
Reuters contributed to this report.
