Georgetown’s water is treated and safe to drink, officials say, but high levels of toxic chemicals remain in the groundwater, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.
The agency says a square-mile plume of groundwater beneath East Laurel and Kimmey streets is contaminated by high concentrations of tetrachloroethylene, a dry-cleaning chemical.
Contamination at at least one of the sites was noted at least 35 years ago, and some efforts to clean the sites had been made in the decades that followed. Yet high levels of tetrachloroethylene in groundwater remain.
It’s a health risk and may require long-term cleanup, the EPA says. The agency is proposing to add the site to the Superfund National Priority List, which would make it eligible for federal funds.
Here’s what you need to know.
What is tetrachloroethylene?
Tetrachloroethylene is a colorless liquid with a sharp, sweet odor, used in dry-cleaning and metal degreasing operations, according to the the agency.
In groundwater, it’s one of the most frequently detected industrial solvents in the country, the EPA says.
The agency classifies it as “likely to be carcinogenic to humans,” and studies have found exposure to be associated with several types of cancer, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma and bladder cancer.
WATER:Delaware, Maryland rivers and streams among the most polluted, report says
Tetrachloroethylene is also known as perchloroethylene, PCE, PERC, tetrachloroethene and perchlor.
How did it get in Georgetown groundwater?
Tetrachloroethylene reaches groundwater after being spilled, leaked or disposed of on the ground.
The Georgetown groundwater plume has two known former dry-cleaning sources, according to the EPA: Georgetown Dry Cleaners (formerly of 305 N. Race St.) and Thoro-Kleen Dry Cleaners (formerly of 11 N. Railroad Ave.), though there may be other contributors, too.
Tetrachloroethylene is slow to break down in water, and plumes from the businesses “appear to have co-mingled,” the EPA says, in Georgetown’s groundwater.
Is Georgetown water safe to drink?
The Georgetown Water Department serves more than 7,200 people, according to the EPA. Both the agency and Georgetown officials say the water is safe to drink, meeting state and federal standards.
According to Georgetown’s 2021 Water Quality Report, there was no tetrachloroethylene detected in the town’s treated drinking water for that period.
The EPA pointed to upgrades at Georgetown’s water treatment plant in 2017, and according to the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Georgetown added an air stripping system in 2019 that removes dissolved gases and volatile substances.
“It’s never been unsafe to drink,” said town manager Gene Dvornick. “I’ve been here 15 years, and we’ve always been in compliance.”
SUSSEX:‘Celebration of his life’: Heacook Fest 2022 to honor slain Delmar officer
Are there risks other than with water?
When tetrachloroethylene vapors migrate through groundwater and soil to the air above, it’s known as a vapor intrusion. They can pose a risk to people in buildings near the groundwater plume, according to the EPA.
Acute inhalation exposure to tetrachloroethylene vapors can include irritation of the upper respiratory tract and eyes and kidney dysfunction, and at lower concentrations, the vapors can cause temporary neurological effects, like mood and behavior changes, coordination impairment, dizziness and headaches, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The EPA will investigate possible vapor intrusions in buildings around the Laurel and Kimmey streets intersection in the coming months.
How is the state involved in the cleanup?
The state has been investigating potential sources of Georgetown groundwater contamination since 1985, according to the EPA, but didn’t request assistance from the agency until 2018.
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control spokesman Michael Globetti declined to comment, but the department has made some effort to cleanup the Georgetown Dry Cleaners and Thoro-Kleen sites over the years. Underground storage tanks at both locations were removed, according to the EPA.
A 1987 DNREC inspection of the Georgetown Dry Cleaners site found a “waste pile” behind the business that had “notable concentrations” of tetrachloroethylene, documents state. A 2002 News Journal story references soil removal at the site.
The 1992 obituary of Georgetown’s Robert Wood said he owned the business for 25 years until he sold it in 1980, but information on whether someone else then continued to operate it could not be found. The site is now a Latino convenience store.
Department efforts at Thoro-Kleen are more recent. DNREC has been trying to force the business’s last owners — Joe Booth, former Georgetown mayor and then-state senator, and his wife, Margaret — to pay for remediation since 2014.
In 1986, Joe Booth purchased Thoro-Kleen from his parents, who had owned and operated the business since the 1960s. He closed the business in 2010.
In 2016, the Booths donated the property to a church in order to enter the Brownfields Program, which includes grants and technical assistance toward cleanups. But the Delaware department said the couple was still liable for offsite contamination. The Booths hired a lawyer and have been in court ever since.
In January, Superior Court Judge Jeffrey Clark ordered the Booths pay the department about $105,500 for costs already incurred, associated with “investigation, study and planning” at the Thoro-Kleen site. DNREC withdrew its request for cleanup costs, according to court documents.
The Booths have appealed the ruling.
BRIDGEVILLE:Sussex approves natural gas project despite opposition from environmental groups
The department announced the adoption of a plan to clean up part of the Thoro-Kleen site in December 2020, including treating groundwater.
What’s next
The EPA will host two question and answer sessions regarding the potential superfund site:
- Phone-in: Thursday, April 14, 6-7 p.m.
Phone number: 484-352-3221
Conference ID: 307589259#
- In-person: Wednesday, April 20, 5:30-7 p.m.
Georgetown Public Library, 123 W. Pine St.
The public can submit comments to the EPA though May 17 using docket number EPA-HQ-OLEM-2022-0190. After considering the comments, if the site still qualifies, the EPA will declare it a superfund site and begin a comprehensive investigation.
DEVELOPMENT:In rare move, Coral Lakes subdivision denied by Sussex Planning and Zoning Commission
FUNDING:Who would benefit in Sussex plan to spend $45.5 million in stimulus funds
Georgetown’s Dvornick said federal resources are a “positive thing for Georgetown and the state.”
“The drinking water is safe,” Dvornick said. “But anything that improves the quality of life … is a good thing.”