Attorney General Merrick Garland testifies before Senate amid special counsel probes and other controversies | CNN Politics




Washington
CNN
 — 

Attorney General Merrick Garland is appearing before a Senate committee on Wednesday, facing questions on everything from the two recently appointed special counsels to reproductive rights to school board meetings.

Garland’s appearance before the Democratic-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee marks his first trip to Capitol Hill this year. It comes as investigations into President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump have taken center stage in recent months.

Garland is likely to face aggressive questions from Republicans as part of their war against the alleged “weaponization” of the Justice Department.

“When you were sworn into office two years ago, the department was embroiled in scandal,” the Judiciary Committee Chairman Dirk Durbin, an Illinois Democrat, said. “You committed to restoring its independence, and I believe you’ve kept your word. I expect that we’ll hear accusations today from some of my Republican colleagues to the contrary, such as weaponization of the Justice Department.”

Garland’s own opening statement touched on topics like efforts to combat the rise of violent crime and hate crimes, work to protect reproductive freedom across the country, and the department’s accomplishments in partnering with the Ukrainian government against Russian aggression.

“Every day, the 115,000 employees of the Justice Department work tirelessly to fulfill our mission: to uphold the rule of law, to keep our country safe, and to protect civil rights,” he said, lauding employees’ efforts to protect national security and “our country’s democratic institutions.”

“Every day, in everything they do, the employees of the Justice Department adhere to and uphold the rule of law that is the foundation of our system of government,” the attorney general said.

Durbin pushed Garland on whether social media companies should be liable for the illegal sale of deadly drugs, comparing their online sale to a “suicide pact.”

“I don’t want to put words in your mouth, but I think Section 230 has become a suicide pact,” Durbin said, referring to a section of the Communications Decency Act that shields tech platforms from being sued over the content users post. “We have basically said to these companies, ‘you are absolved from liability, make money’ … and deaths result from it, and we have a responsibility.”

Garland agreed that “we do have to do something to force (tech platforms) to provide information, to search their own platforms for sales of illegal drugs,” and pledged that the committee has the DOJ’s support in efforts to reduce the online sale of deadly drugs and target algorithms that may be boosting their sale.

The attorney general added that the department supports “a better way to get the social media companies, whether it’s civil or criminal, to take these kinds of things off their platforms.”

Some of the focus on Wednesday could be on the ongoing federal investigations into classified documents recovered at the offices and homes of Biden, Trump, and former Vice President Mike Pence, including about why the department chose to omit certain actions from their timeline of the Biden probe, and whether Garland will put a special counsel in charge of the Pence probe if the former vice president announces a 2024 White House bid.

Senators may also ask about federal charges against Charles McGonigal, the former head of counterintelligence for the FBI’s New York field office. McGonigal is charged with illegally working for one of Russia’s most notorious oligarchs, Oleg Deripaska, who was linked to the FBI’s Russia probe thanks to his ties to Paul Manafort, who served for a time as Trump’s 2016 campaign chairman.

The attorney general, however, will likely be hesitant to answer questions about any ongoing investigations since doing so goes against longstanding Justice Department policy.

Republicans may also push Garland on debunked claims that he called parents terrorists for attending or wanting to attend school board meetings.

The claim stems from a 2021 letter from The National School Boards Association asking the DOJ to “deal with” the uptick in threats against education officials and equating that activity to “domestic terrorism.” Garland released a memo encouraging federal and local authorities to work together against the harassment campaigns levied at schools, but never endorsed the “domestic terrorism” notion. The issue has been seized on by some of Garland’s loudest critics in Congress, with at least one member of the Senate committee having called on him to resign over it.

For their part, Democrats may want to quiz Garland on how the Biden administration is responding to fallout from the Supreme Court’s decision last year to reverse Roe v. Wade. The federal government’s options for beefing up protections for the abortion are limited, but DOJ promised earlier this year to monitor new anti-abortion bills percolating in the states.

Lawmakers also might want to touch on whether there is more the department can do to curb police violence in the wake of Tyre Nichols’ death, and the department’s work to combat GOP efforts to undermine voting rights in states.

And senators from both parties might have questions for Garland on his department’s antitrust investigation into Live Nation Entertainment, the owner of Ticketmaster, which has drawn the ire of lawmakers, regulators and music fans alike after the service had a ticket sale meltdown last year.

This story has been updated with additional developments.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *