The proposals range from prohibiting instruction about gender identity in the classroom to restricting access to gender-affirming health care and excluding transgender youth from school athletics.
HB 1557, titled the “Parental Rights in Education” bill, was given final passage by Florida’s GOP-controlled legislature earlier this month. The law is set to take effect in July.
But Florida isn’t the only state pushing legislation that many opponents say is potentially harmful to LGBTQ children and young adults.
Earlier this month, Idaho’s state House approved HB 675, which stipulates medical personnel who provide gender-affirming health care and parents who agree for their child to receive such care could face life in prison. The bill passed 55-13 and now moves to the Senate. The measure adds medical care for transgender youth to a section of Idaho law already on the books that bans female genital mutilation.
And in Georgia, lawmakers introduced a bill similar to Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” bill. Among other classroom restrictions, the Georgia bill aims to “deter developmentally inappropriate classroom discussion of gender identity and sexual orientation” for primary school students.
Iowa, Tennessee, and Oklahoma are among the states that are considering the most pieces of anti-LGBTQ legislation, according to the American Civil Liberties Union.
Florida’s ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill
“We will continue to recognize that in the state of Florida, parents have a fundamental role in the education, health care and well-being of their children. We will not move from that,” DeSantis, a Republican, said during Monday’s bill signing.
The reaction: In the weeks leading up to the signing of the bill, Florida students hosted school walkouts in protest.
On Monday, DeSantis’ move was met with immediate backlash from LGBTQ advocates, including the Trevor Project, a nonprofit organization that works on suicide prevention among LGBTQ youth.
“LGBTQ youth in Florida deserve better. They deserve to see their history, their families, and themselves reflected in the classroom,” said Amit Paley, the group’s CEO and executive director, in a statement. “While I am saddened to see this harmful bill signed into law, I am inspired by the outpouring of support for LGBTQ students we have seen from parents, teachers, celebrities, and their peers. Social support is vital for suicide prevention, and I want to remind LGBTQ youth in Florida and across the country that you are not alone.”
What’s next? The law is set to take effect in July.
Texas’ anti-trans health care order
The reaction: Texas DFPS has yet to launch an investigation into any family seeking gender-affirming procedures of prescribed medication. The first attempt was barred by a district court judge in Texas after the Texas ACLU filed a restraining order on behalf of a family wanting gender-affirming health care for their trans daughter. On Wednesday, the Third Court of Appeals in Texas dismissed Abbott’s appeal to a temporary restraining order that ordered the state to halt its investigation of the family with the transgender teen.
Less than a week after the governor issued the directive, the ACLU and other groups claimed DFPS was already investigating multiple families, including the family mentioned in the lawsuit and listed anonymously as the “Doe” family.
Last week, Jeff Younger — a Republican candidate for the Texas House of Representatives and supporter of Abbott’s order — was confronted by a group of protesters at University of North Texas for an event hosted by a conservative student group on campus. Social media shows video of Younger clapping at students chanting “fascists” at him as they banged on desks in protest. Students who attended the event reported that Younger was met with more boos and chanting while he spoke.
What’s next? With Abbott’s order being challenged in court, it’s unclear what its fate will be.
Abbott and Paxton were both candidates for the Republican primary last week in which Abbott won the primary for governor and Paxton advanced to the runoff.
Iowa’s transgender sports ban
“Based on their sex” — as defined by the bill — means the sex that is defined on a student’s birth certificate.
Reynolds argued that the physicality of someone assigned male at birth is a natural advantage in comparison to that of a woman, thus inspiring her decisions to pass the bill. She said that allowing trans women to play women’s sports is not inclusive because they are still men in her opinion.
The reaction: Iowa schools have already openly opposed the bill. In a statement last Thursday, the Cedar Rapids Community School District (CRCSD) said it will not support “any anti-LGBTQ+ laws.”
“Our purpose is to serve and protect our LGTBQ+ youth, as every member of our CRCSD community is valued and respected regardless of gender identity,” the CRCSD said.
The ACLU of Iowa has expressed concerns for the bill on social media stating, “This is a dark day for Iowa.”
LGBTQ rights groups like Trevor Project and the Human Rights Campaign have also publicly opposed the legislation. They have also shared their support for trans youth in Iowa on social media, and they stated that they will continue to advocate for trans rights in the state.
What’s next? After signing the bill, it was immediately put into effect in the state.
Tennessee’s ban on ‘LGBTQ lifestyle issues’
The reaction: Students and LGBTQ activists have taken to social media saying the bill causes more harm to LGBTQ youth.
The bill says books and instructional materials supporting LGBTQ issues and life experiences are anti-Christian and are less necessary than reading, writing and math.
Oklahoma’s book ban
What’s next? The bill was passed by the Senate and now moves to the House floor.
The story has been updated to reflect that Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has signed HB 1557, titled the “Parental Rights in Education” bill.
CNN’s Priya Krishnakumar, Devan Cole and Tina Burnside contributed to this report.